Saint Louis University
October has brought us students back to Cuernavaca, back to speakers, back to Spanish Classes. On returning to Mexico the Crossing Borders students have been investing a lot of time into learning about Globalization and Neoliberal economic thought. This week in our Political Science class many of us are learning new concepts involving the idea of Globalization and feminist thought.
To start classes out and to be prepared for many of our speakers it was obvious that we needed a definition of the G-word. GLOBALIZATION.
A paper and a test later we learned that globalization was, as Anthony Giddens wrote in Global Capitalism, “The intensification of world-wide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice-versa.”[1] Or a much simpler way of thinking is the USA sneezes and Mexico catches pneumonia as Fred Rosen[2] stated in his talk on Neolibral thought and economic Globalization.


Globalization in Mexico
I think that one of the more exciting talks was with Irene Ortiz[3], who gave a Mexican woman’s feminist viewpoint on globalization, and it’s effects here in Mexico as well as the US. One of her main points was drawing from a book we had been reading called Liberating Economics[4], which contained a diagram of economics based on gender views and societal views. Contrasting Gender as natural with gender as socially constructed, intersected by society as independent and collective. The best place for feminist economics is where gender as socially constructed meets a collective society.
I thought that the talk on society as a whole lead to some good questions. I think that as US citizens, with in the US culture it is easy to forget just how independent we are. Children are encouraged to leave go their own at about 18. Part of our independent culture encourages us to do well on our own and then we can make up the whole of society. But do we really benefit all of society when we do this, or just ourselves? Where as here in Mexico and else where cultures are more collective, meaning that society is a whole and cannot be reduced to parts. Everyone is responsible for everyone.
I thought that the talk on society as a whole lead to some good questions. I think that as US citizens, with in the US culture it is easy to forget just how independent we are. Children are encouraged to leave go their own at about 18. Part of our independent culture encourages us to do well on our own and then we can make up the whole of society. But do we really benefit all of society when we do this, or just ourselves? Where as here in Mexico and else where cultures are more collective, meaning that society is a whole and cannot be reduced to parts. Everyone is responsible for everyone.
Studendts Learning and Discussing GlobalizationThese societal viewpoints are important. But the heavy influence and struggle for individual has lead to the hurt of many. Because there is no struggle for the collective, it is hard for unions to form. People, mainly women, are afraid to unionize because it may result in the lowering of their wages. They want what is best for the individual, the highest price, even in the event that is requires more work than is necessary.
The question then becomes, how does a collective society come into being? And will the individual be lost within the collective? Or will the lives of many be better due to sacrifices of a few?
[1] Anthony Giddens, notes from POL 359 class, 14th October, 2009.
[2] Fred Rosen, economist and journalist, talk on Neolibralism and Globalization 9th October, 2009
[3] Irene Ortiz, Feminist and Organizer of Domestic Workers, talk 13th October, 2009
[4] Barker, Drucilla K and Susan Feiner. Liberating Economics: Feminist perspectives on families, work, and globalization. University of Michigan Press, 2004.






beautiful country of El Salvador. From learning about the history of the country and the struggles

-----